We work with cloud providers, model vendors, data platforms and regional implementation partners. Where a partner relationship pays us anything, we disclose it to the client before recommending them — because a recommendation you cannot trust is worth less than no recommendation.

Across cloud, AI, data and delivery
Commission relationships declared to clients
Exclusive vendor commitments held
Partner programmes in our industry are generous, and the generosity is not accidental. A firm holding a platinum tier with one cloud provider, one data platform and one model vendor has a financial interest in every architectural recommendation it makes. This is rarely dishonest and almost never disclosed.
We hold partnerships because they genuinely help: earlier access to capability, direct engineering escalation, better commercial terms that we pass through to clients. But we hold them across competing vendors on purpose, we sign no exclusives, and where a recommendation would earn us anything we say so in the document that contains the recommendation.
It is a small piece of hygiene that costs us margin. It also means our architecture advice is worth reading.
Competing vendors in the same category is a feature. It keeps our evaluations honest and gives clients a genuine choice.
Certified delivery capability across all three major clouds plus Cloudflare, so platform choice can follow your existing commitments and data residency requirements rather than our certifications.
Relationships with frontier model providers and open-weight ecosystems. We deliberately maintain several, because the leading model for a given task changes every few months and we refuse to be locked to a roadmap.
Implementation partnerships across the major warehouse and lakehouse platforms plus the transformation and orchestration tooling that sits around them.
Local partners in seven markets providing on-the-ground presence, regulatory familiarity and language coverage where a remote team would be a disadvantage.

If we would earn a referral fee, rebate or tier credit from something we are recommending, it is stated in the recommendation document. Not in a footnote, and not on request.
We sign no agreement that requires us to lead with a particular vendor. Several partner programmes have offered better terms in exchange for exclusivity and we have declined all of them.
Negotiated pricing, credits and migration funding pass through to the client rather than into our margin. We are paid for our work, not for our position in someone else's channel.
Across four categories
By deliberate policy
In the recommendation itself
It is a reasonable question and it should have a straightforward answer. Ours is in every recommendation document we produce.